Cookie Settings

    We use cookies to understand how visitors use Triagen — so we can improve the site and show you relevant updates. Your data stays in the EU and is never sold to third parties.

    Learn More
    Triagen LogoTriagen
    occupational health

    Standardisation Without Dehumanisation

    Miranda Zwepink · CEOJanuary 26, 20262 min read
    Standardisation Without Dehumanisation

    In conversations about absence management, it comes up almost immediately: "We need to be careful with standardisation. Every case is different." That concern is understandable. Absence is about people, not processes. Nobody wants to be reduced to a form. Yet in practice, I see something different happening.

    Where the fear comes from

    Many professionals have had bad experiences with rigid protocols. With systems that leave little room for nuance or professional judgement. The reflex to distrust "process" is therefore logical. That resistance isn't an aversion to structure. It's a way of protecting craftsmanship.

    What happens when structure is missing

    Ironically, the absence of standardisation rarely leads to more humanity. Often the opposite happens. Without clear structure:

    • intake differs from case to case
    • information gets lost
    • the same questions are asked multiple times
    • unintended differences emerge between employees and files

    The time that was meant for the real conversation disappears into repair work.

    The reality for the occupational physician

    Occupational physicians don't want a straitjacket. They want to be prepared. With the right information, at the right moment. What holds them back isn't structure, but noise:

    • incomplete files
    • inconsistent intake quality
    • having to reconstruct context again and again

    That costs energy. And energy spent there can't go to the person behind the file.

    What now? Structure enables focus on what matters

    What standardisation can actually be

    Standardisation never has to mean that everyone is treated the same. It's about standardising what is repeatable. For example:

    • how information is collected
    • when triage takes place
    • which basic questions are always asked

    What should never be standardised:

    • medical judgement
    • the conversation
    • professional assessment

    Structure should support, not dictate.

    Why this is urgent

    Pressure on the absence management chain is increasing. Caseloads are growing. Expectations are rising. Professionals are scarce. In such a system, working without structure isn't freedom, it's a risk. It makes quality vulnerable and dependent on individual resilience.

    Humanity requires space

    Real attention takes time. That space doesn't appear by itself. It emerges when professionals are relieved of unnecessary variation and administrative noise.

    Humanity doesn't disappear because of standardisation. It disappears when skilled professionals are structurally overwhelmed.


    Miranda Zwepink — CEO, Triagen

    About the author

    Miranda Zwepink

    Miranda Zwepink

    CEO, Triagen

    CEO and co-founder of Triagen. 20+ years of hands-on experience in occupational health, absenteeism management and reintegration, guiding employees, advising HR and management on absenteeism policy and reintegration strategy. Has worked through occupational health providers and as an independent professional with organisations including A.S. Watson, De Bijenkorf, V&D, Dental Clinics, Fletcher Hotels, Parnassia Groep and Dienst Justitiële Zorginstellingen (DFZS). Founded Triagen because absence conversations too often begin without context, while the first hours decide much of what follows.

    LinkedIn